From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 21:27:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Make "local" orthogonal to date format
Message-ID: <20150902212733.GA21612@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqfv2wmup7.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 01:29:08PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> writes:
> 
> > In which case, should we just support it now?
> >
> > Normally I'd suggest banning controversial options on the basis that
> > it's easier in the future to allow something that was previously banned
> > than change the meaning of an options, but in this case I can't see any
> > other meaning for these options than that described above.
> 
> My usual stance is the same as yours, and I agree that there is no
> other sane and useful behaviour for "relative-local" to do the same
> as "relative".

That sounds fine to me. Then we don't have to worry about the error
messages. ;)

-Peff