Re: [PATCH 3/4] lock_ref_sha1_basic: simplify error code path
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 19, 2014, 02:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20141119020713.GT6527@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20141119020451.GA2734@peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> Hmph. Should we just abandon my series in favor of taking Ronnie's > original patch, then? We can apply the "save/restore errno in error()" > patch independently if we like.
I liked patches 1 and 2 and the explanation from patch 4. Perhaps patch 3 should be replaced with a patch renaming unlock_ref to free_ref_lock or something.
Thanks, Jonathan