From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 02:07:13 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] lock_ref_sha1_basic: simplify error code path
Message-ID: <20141119020713.GT6527@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141119020451.GA2734@peff.net>

Jeff King wrote:

> Hmph. Should we just abandon my series in favor of taking Ronnie's
> original patch, then? We can apply the "save/restore errno in error()"
> patch independently if we like.

I liked patches 1 and 2 and the explanation from patch 4.  Perhaps
patch 3 should be replaced with a patch renaming unlock_ref to
free_ref_lock or something.

Thanks,
Jonathan