Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rev-parse and "--"
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Dec 9, 2013, 19:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20131209192334.GT29959@google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20131209191224.GR29959@google.com>
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Isn't this essentially breaking a contract
To clarify, if there were some strong motivation --- e.g. if this were resolving some security problem --- then I would be all for breaking compatibility in this way. What's confusing to me is that I just don't see the motivation. Why wouldn't someone that wants this functionality be able to pass a flag for it?
Is the idea that without a flag it's easier to teach or something?
Hoping that clarifies, Jonathan