Re: [PATCH 3/6] revert: fix buffer overflow in insn sheet parser
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 20, 2011, 08:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20111020080328.GA12337@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v8vogbgai.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
>> Check that the commit name argument to a "pick" or "revert" action in >> '.git/sequencer/todo' is not too long
[...]
> Given that this function is going to be fixed properly so that it does not > even need to use the "on-stack buffer", is this really necessary?
Right, I don't think it is. Keeping a testcase sounds worthwhile, though.