Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests: make test_must_fail more verbose
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 31, 2010, 17:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100831171055.GO2315@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100831155636.GA11530@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> --- a/t/test-lib.sh
> +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
> @@ -591,7 +591,15 @@ test_path_is_missing () {
>
> test_must_fail () {
> "$@"
> - test $? -gt 0 -a $? -le 129 -o $? -gt 192
> + exit_code=$?
> + if test $exit_code = 0; then
> + echo >&2 "test_must_fail: command succeeded: $*"
> + return 1
> + elif test $exit_code -gt 129 -a $exit_code -le 192; then
> + echo >&2 "test_must_fail: died by signal: $*"
> + return 1
> + fi
> + return 0
> }Can the exit status (e.g. from a shell function) be negative?
Though your patch does not affect this, a command interrupted by a signal will receive exit status > 192 in shells like ksh93. Posix says:
As explained in other sections, certain exit status values have been reserved for special uses and should be used by applications only for those purposes:
126 A file to be executed was found, but it was not an executable utility. 127 A utility to be executed was not found. >128 A command was interrupted by a signal.
Unfortunately that does not agree with git usage.
129 Incorrect command-line usage, or help requested (rather than SIGHUP). 255 Failed to create pipe for child process, fork failed, execvp failed, wait failed, invalid pathspec for add --patch, "git archive" or "git daemon" failure (rather than signal 127).
Here's a test_might_fail patch for consistency.
-- 8< -- Subject: tests: make test_might_fail more verbose
Let test_might_fail say something about its failures for consistency with test_must_fail.
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> --- t/test-lib.sh | 7 ++++++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh index 285bfd8..506787c 100644 --- a/t/test-lib.sh +++ b/t/test-lib.sh @@ -615,7 +615,12 @@ test_must_fail () { test_might_fail () { "$@" - test $? -ge 0 -a $? -le 129 -o $? -gt 192 + exit_code=$? + if test $exit_code -gt 129 -a $exit_code -le 192; then + echo >&2 "test_might_fail: died by signal: $*" + return 1 + fi + return 0 } # test_cmp is a helper function to compare actual and expected output.
-- 1.7.2.2