Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2009, #04; Mon, 19)
- From
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss@iguanasuicide.net>
- Date
- Jan 20, 2009, 05:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200901192317.23079.bss@iguanasuicide.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vbpu3r745.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Monday 19 January 2009, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote about 'What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2009, #04; Mon, 19)':
>Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with '-' > are only in 'pu' while commits prefixed with '+' are in 'next'. The > ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the branches, but I am > still holding onto them.
Is there anywhere you are publishing these refs? Of course, I see the commits in 'pu', but sometimes I would like to merge something you have in 'next'/'pu' into a branch based on 'master' or one of my local branches, and I have to go hunting for the commit SHA.
It's not a big deal: qgit, gitk, and 'git log'+grep all solve the issue quickly enough, and I don't want to add to your workload. I was just hoping they were already published and I could simply add a remote to my config to get them.
Currently, I'm just using:
* remote origin
URL: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
Remote branch merged with 'git pull' while on branch master
master
Tracked remote branches
html maint man master next pu todo
and I get this:
$ git pull origin jk/color-parse
fatal: Couldn't find remote ref jk/color-parse-- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/