Re: Reporting bugs and bisection
- From
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date
- Apr 15, 2008, 04:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080415045541.GA611@1wt.eu>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080414160513.9f57e5ba.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 04:05:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Show 24 quoted lines
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:01:05 -0700 (PDT) > David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote: > > > From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> > > Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:54:00 +1000 (EST) > > > > > - Things like "who made the kernel" statistics and related articles ignore > > > code review. > > > > Note the apparent irony in that the person who ends up often on the > > top of those lists, Al Viro, is also someone who also does a > > significant amount of code review. > > > > I think this is no accident. > > "who made the kernel" was an interesting and useful exercise, but if you > like irony then... > > - The way to boost your commit count is to submit buggy patches and to > then fix your own bugs. > > - The way to lower your commit count is to fix things in other people's > patches, then fold your fix into the base patch. I've lost over 1000 > commits that way. Unless they are counting '^ [akpm' as a commit.
And if Dave speaks about these stats : http://lwn.net/Articles/237768/ then Al does not even appear in it, which proves your point.
Willy