Re: [PATCH] provide advance warning of some future pack default changes

> "Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> If cvs 1.11 doesn't talk with 1.12 I'll say there are nuts - minor
>> revisions should interoperate with end users not even thinking about
>> it. But 1.5.5 has in its changelog lots of deprecations and interop
>> changes.
>>
>> It's not good communication to label it 1.5.5.
> 
> There indeed are handful scheduled removals.  I do not mind declaring
> that 1.6.0 comes after 1.5.4, or just relabel the removal schedule for
> 1.6.0 and keep the scheduled change on hold a bit longer.