Re: [PATCH] Improved and extended t5404
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2007, 04:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071115042625.GA10094@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20071113231048.GB19444@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:10:48PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > This one is on top of what is in next. It also include the check for > > deleting remote braches I sent before. Regarding this one: if a remote > > branch is deleted, shouldn't the matching tracking branch be removed > > as well? The code in master seem to do that. > > Yes, it should (the code in update_tracking_ref seems to handle that > case, but I haven't tested, so I may have bungled something). I am > literally walking out the door, now, though, so I will be out of touch > for at least a day.
After I became disconnected, I looked at my 'next', and the reason for the failure to delete the ref seems to be your is_null_sha1 error-checking patch, which Junio put in next. But maybe you have figured that out in the intervening time. :)
-Peff