From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:26:26 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improved and extended t5404
Message-ID: <20071115042625.GA10094@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20071113231048.GB19444@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 06:10:48PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:

> > This one is on top of what is in next. It also include the check for
> > deleting remote braches I sent before. Regarding this one: if a remote
> > branch is deleted, shouldn't the matching tracking branch be removed
> > as well? The code in master seem to do that.
> 
> Yes, it should (the code in update_tracking_ref seems to handle that
> case, but I haven't tested, so I may have bungled something). I am
> literally walking out the door, now, though, so I will be out of touch
> for at least a day.

After I became disconnected, I looked at my 'next', and the reason for
the failure to delete the ref seems to be your is_null_sha1
error-checking patch, which Junio put in next. But maybe you have
figured that out in the intervening time. :)

-Peff