[PATCH] Add test that checks diverse aspects of updating remote and tracking branches
- From
Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 14, 2007, 22:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20071114224926.GF3973@steel.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vbq9wfqb0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Because we haven't settled on what the exit status from "git push" command itself should be in such a partial failure case, do not check the exit status from it for now.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> ---
Junio C Hamano, Wed, Nov 14, 2007 22:52:19 +0100:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> writes: > > > Ignore exit code of git push in t5404, as it is not relevant for the > > test: it already checks whether the references updated correctly. > > I think the Subject: goes a lot better with a description like this: > > Add test that checks the case where X does Y and make > sure Z happens.
Add test that checks diverse aspects of updating remote and tracking branches.
> Because we haven't settled on what the exit status from > "git push" command itself should be in such a partial > failure case, do not check the exit status from it for > now.
This I'll leave as is.
> > + git branch b3 && > > So it makes another ref "b3" point at the initial commit,...
Right
> > + b3=$(git rev-parse origin/b3) && > > ... then records what was cloned,...
Precisely
> > + test "$(git rev-parse origin/b3)" = "$b3" && > > ... and checks that untouched "b3" stays the same (iow, tests > up-to-date case).
Yep.
Show 19 quoted lines
> > +
> > +test_expect_success 'delete remote branch' '
> > + git push origin :refs/heads/b3
> > + {
> > + git rev-parse origin/b3
> > + test $? != 0 || \
> > + say "Hmm... Maybe tracking ref should be deleted?"
> > + } &&
>
> Ah, you meant that tracking should be deleted so this should be
> fixed in the code but the test is disabled for now. Let's be a
> bit more explicit about such a temporary disabled test, like
> this:
>
> git push origin :refs/heads/b3
>
> # The remote-tracking branch origin/b3 should be deleted;
> # we need to update the code and enable this test.
> : git rev-parse --verify origin/b3 &&Nice, will take this. Except we have to check for absence of the tracking branch. git-rev-parse must fail.
t/t5404-tracking-branches.sh | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100755 t/t5404-tracking-branches.sh
diff --git a/t/t5404-tracking-branches.sh b/t/t5404-tracking-branches.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..d861a14 --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t5404-tracking-branches.sh @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='tracking branch update checks for git push' + +. ./test-lib.sh + +test_expect_success 'setup' ' + echo 1 >file && + git add file && + git commit -m 1 && + git branch b1 && + git branch b2 && + git branch b3 && + git clone . aa && + git checkout b1 && + echo b1 >>file && + git commit -a -m b1 && + git checkout b2 && + echo b2 >>file && + git commit -a -m b2 +' + +start_dir="$(pwd)" + +test_expect_success 'check tracking branches updated correctly after push' ' + cd aa && + b1=$(git rev-parse origin/b1) && + b2=$(git rev-parse origin/b2) && + b3=$(git rev-parse origin/b3) && + git checkout -b b1 origin/b1 && + echo aa-b1 >>file && + git commit -a -m aa-b1 && + git checkout -b b2 origin/b2 && + echo aa-b2 >>file && + git commit -a -m aa-b2 && + git checkout master && + echo aa-master >>file && + git commit -a -m aa-master && + { + git push + test "$(git rev-parse origin/b1)" = "$b1" && + test "$(git rev-parse origin/b2)" = "$b2" && + test "$(git rev-parse origin/b3)" = "$b3" && + test "$(git rev-parse origin/master)" = \ + "$(git rev-parse master)" + } +' + +test_expect_success 'delete remote branch' ' + git push origin :refs/heads/b3 + { + # The remote-tracking branch origin/b3 should be deleted; + # we need to update the code and enable this test. + : git rev-parse --verify origin/b3 + : test $? != 0 + } && + cd "$start_dir" && + { + git rev-parse refs/heads/b3 + test $? != 0 + } +' + +test_done
-- 1.5.3.5.692.ge1737