Re: strbuf new API, take 2 for inclusion
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:16:21PM +0000, Jeff King wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:15:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> > Yes, Junio already did that remark. The reason is that it's forward
> > compatible: if we ever change strbuf's intitial value for some reason,
> > we would just have to rebuild the code. As junio disliked it (and I'm
> > not sure I love it either) I've used it where using the _init() function
> > was impractical.
>
> OK, I missed that discussion. Thanks for the explanation.
That was on IRC, maybe that's the why :)
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org