From: Pierre Habouzit Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:19:13 GMT Subject: Re: strbuf new API, take 2 for inclusion Message-ID: <20070906171913.GH8451@artemis.corp> In-Reply-To: <20070906171621.GA5305@coredump.intra.peff.net> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 05:16:21PM +0000, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:15:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > > Yes, Junio already did that remark. The reason is that it's forward > > compatible: if we ever change strbuf's intitial value for some reason, > > we would just have to rebuild the code. As junio disliked it (and I'm > > not sure I love it either) I've used it where using the _init() function > > was impractical. > > OK, I missed that discussion. Thanks for the explanation. That was on IRC, maybe that's the why :) -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org