Re: strbuf new API, take 2 for inclusion
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Sep 6, 2007, 17:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070906171621.GA5305@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20070906171502.GF8451@artemis.corp>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:15:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Yes, Junio already did that remark. The reason is that it's forward > compatible: if we ever change strbuf's intitial value for some reason, > we would just have to rebuild the code. As junio disliked it (and I'm > not sure I love it either) I've used it where using the _init() function > was impractical.
OK, I missed that discussion. Thanks for the explanation.
-Peff