From: Jeff King Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:16:21 GMT Subject: Re: strbuf new API, take 2 for inclusion Message-ID: <20070906171621.GA5305@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <20070906171502.GF8451@artemis.corp> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:15:02PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Yes, Junio already did that remark. The reason is that it's forward > compatible: if we ever change strbuf's intitial value for some reason, > we would just have to rebuild the code. As junio disliked it (and I'm > not sure I love it either) I've used it where using the _init() function > was impractical. OK, I missed that discussion. Thanks for the explanation. -Peff