Re: [RFC?] Telling git about more complex relationships between commits (Was: Re: FFmpeg considering GIT)
- From
Andrew Ruder <andy@aeruder.net>
- Date
- May 4, 2007, 12:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20070504120651.GA6053@bowser.ruder>
- In-Reply-To
- <200705041239.22300.andyparkins@gmail.com>
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:39:18PM +0100, Andy Parkins wrote:
> That way git-svn wouldn't (necessarily) need to keep its .rev_db file, and it > wouldn't need any special handling to allow the repository to be cloned.
Which, BTW, would be a great thing as on subversion repositories with lots of revisions and lots of branches/tags, the disk space for all those .rev_db files gets pretty bad. i.e. du -sh .git/objects == 14M, du -sh .git == 120M.
- Andy
-- Andrew Ruder <andy@aeruder.net> http://www.aeruder.net