From: Andrew Ruder <andy@aeruder.net>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 12:06:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC?] Telling git about more complex relationships between commits (Was: Re: FFmpeg considering GIT)
Message-ID: <20070504120651.GA6053@bowser.ruder>
In-Reply-To: <200705041239.22300.andyparkins@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 12:39:18PM +0100, Andy Parkins wrote:
> That way git-svn wouldn't (necessarily) need to keep its .rev_db file, and it 
> wouldn't need any special handling to allow the repository to be cloned.

Which, BTW, would be a great thing as on subversion repositories with
lots of revisions and lots of branches/tags, the disk space for all those
.rev_db files gets pretty bad.  i.e. du -sh .git/objects == 14M, du -sh
.git == 120M.

- Andy

-- 
Andrew Ruder <andy@aeruder.net>
http://www.aeruder.net