Re: git and time
- From
- Matthew L Foster <mfoster167@yahoo.com>
- Date
- Sep 28, 2006, 22:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060928225505.23517.qmail@web51003.mail.yahoo.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609290032440.14200@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
--- Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> what exactly are you trying to achieve here?
Timestamps not being all over the place in gitweb.cgi.
> If you really want to understand why git does not rely on timestamps, and > why it should not, and why you can still be happy nevertheless, there are > enough answers in this thread.
I agree and understand that distributed git should not and does not rely on timestamps, I am just suggesting that it might be worthwhile to _locally_ track local commit time more efficiently for local use in things like gitweb.cgi.
-Matt
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com