Re: git and time
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 1, 2006, 08:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.63.0610011034550.14200@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v64f47uix.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Hi,
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I think we cannot get away without honestly doing the first descendant, > which is unfortunately a lot more expensive.
... and which happens to be almost implemented in git-name-rev.
Ciao, Dscho