Re: git and time
- From
- Matthew L Foster <mfoster167@yahoo.com>
- Date
- Sep 27, 2006, 18:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20060927180147.33024.qmail@web51009.mail.yahoo.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <451A8AD9.2010107@op5.se>
> Because git doesn't care about timestamps. It stores them as comments > (albeit auto-formatted comments) and relies on the dependency chain to > provide history.
Ok, the word "history" in the context of git primarily means the order of changes not the when? Would it be a conceptual or technical issue for git to directly track the local time of merges/changesets?
-Matt
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com