From: Matthew L Foster <mfoster167@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:55:05 GMT
Subject: Re: git and time
Message-ID: <20060928225505.23517.qmail@web51003.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609290032440.14200@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>

--- Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:

> what exactly are you trying to achieve here? 

Timestamps not being all over the place in gitweb.cgi. 

> If you really want to understand why git does not rely on timestamps, and 
> why it should not, and why you can still be happy nevertheless, there are 
> enough answers in this thread.

I agree and understand that distributed git should not and does not rely on timestamps, I am just
suggesting that it might be worthwhile to _locally_ track local commit time more efficiently for
local use in things like gitweb.cgi. 

-Matt

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com