Re: [PATCH 2/5] scalar: use index.skipHash=true for performance
- From
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 30, 2025, 19:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <089c3225-82cb-4039-83df-f97ea9fd49b2@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqldjsl53m.fsf@gitster.g>
On 11/26/2025 6:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes: > >> diff --git a/t/t9210-scalar.sh b/t/t9210-scalar.sh >> index 43c210a23d..91d5964b73 100755 >> --- a/t/t9210-scalar.sh >> +++ b/t/t9210-scalar.sh >> @@ -246,6 +246,11 @@ test_expect_success 'scalar reconfigure --all with includeIf.onbranch' ' >> ' >> >> test_expect_success 'scalar reconfigure --all with detached HEADs' ' >> + # This test demonstrates an issue with index.skipHash=true and >> + # this test variable for the split index. Disable the test variable. >> + GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX= && >> + export GIT_TEST_SPLIT_INDEX && > > Interesting. I would have expected to see a simple "sane_unset", > instead of exporting an empty setting explicitly.
That's indeed a better way to do it. Will do in v2.
Thanks, -Stolee