threads / patch / 42088

patchtag.c: remove extern keyword from function definition

Subject: [PATCH] tag.c: remove extern keyword from function definition

## tl;dr

2 messages between Apr 20, 2016 and Apr 20, 2016. Diffs are folded; open one to read it.

replies: 1people: 2as markdown or json

Ramsay Jones· Apr 20, 2016, 15:34 UTC · lore
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
---
Hi Santiago,

If you need to re-roll your 'st/verify-tag' branch, could you please squash this into the relevant patch (commit c5213b40, "verify-tag: move tag verification code to tag.c", 19-04-2016).

Although not actually an error, it is very unusual for an extern keyword to be used on a function definition (it seems to be getting quite unusual on a function declaration these days!), which causes sparse to issue a warning.

Thanks!

ATB, Ramsay Jones

 tag.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Show changes to tag.c +1 −1
diff --git a/tag.c b/tag.c
index ace619a..93c6ae6 100644
--- a/tag.c
+++ b/tag.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int run_gpg_verify(const char *buf, unsigned long size, unsigned flags)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-extern int gpg_verify_tag(const unsigned char *sha1,
+int gpg_verify_tag(const unsigned char *sha1,
 		const char *name_to_report, unsigned flags)
 {
 	enum object_type type;
-- 
2.8.0
Santiago Torres· Apr 20, 2016, 15:39 UTC · re: Ramsay Jones · lore

Re: [PATCH] tag.c: remove extern keyword from function definition

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:34:25PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
> ---
> 
> Hi Santiago,
> 
> If you need to re-roll your 'st/verify-tag' branch, could you
> please squash this into the relevant patch (commit c5213b40,
> "verify-tag: move tag verification code to tag.c", 19-04-2016).
> 
> Although not actually an error, it is very unusual for an extern
> keyword to be used on a function definition (it seems to be getting
> quite unusual on a function declaration these days!), which causes
> sparse to issue a warning.

Oh sure! I'm waiting to see if there are more reviews regarding this and I'll re-roll. It's defintely unecessary to have the extern keyword there.

Thanks for pointing it out!
-Santiago.

← back to recent threads