Re: [PATCH 1/2] notes: don't expand qualified refs in expand_notes_ref
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 16, 2015, 22:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqzj0mkn7r.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1442441194-5506-2-git-send-email-jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com> > > The documentation for --refs says that it will treat unqualified refs as > under refs/notes. Current behavior is to prefix refs/notes to all > strings that do not start with refs/notes or notes/, resulting in > performing actions on refs such as "refs/notes/refs/foo/bar" instead of > attempting to perform actions on "refs/foo/bar".
That actually sounds like a sensible thing to do, if you replace 'foo' with 'heads', for example, i.e. refs/notes/refs/heads/bar is a notes about commits reachable from the branch whose name is 'bar'.
So given "refs/heads/bar", which is unqualified in the context of talking about references that hold notes trees, the current behaviour to turn it into "refs/notes/refs/heads/bar" is very sensible, I would think.