Re: [RFC] deprecate git stash save?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 12, 2017, 11:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqy3ogy5wf.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqmv4x2ngs.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> writes: > >> git stash push is the newer interface for creating a stash. While we >> are still keeping git stash save around for the time being, it's better >> to point new users of git stash to the more modern (and more feature >> rich) interface, instead of teaching them the older version that we >> might want to phase out in the future. > > With devil's advocate hat on, because the primary point of "stash" > being "clear the desk quickly", I do not necessarily agree that > "more feature rich" is a plus and something we should nudge newbies > towards.
I do not particulary view "feature richness" is the primary benefit of 'push' that makes it shine. 'save' has a quirk in the command line option syntax, but 'push' corrects it, and that is why we want to move users towards the latter.
IOW, I do not object to the agenda; it is just I found the justification used to push the agenda forward was flawed.
Thanks.