Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re* Consequences of CRLF in index?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2017, 02:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpo942fzk.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kbNMWqPkk9PGDH44YYPC=Mgqk4+sTmRwQUGKF_JCmbpLA@mail.gmail.com>
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
> (I note this as you regard your patches as a lunch time hack > in the cooking email; I am serious about these patches though.)
We do not want to touch borrowed code unnecessarily. Are these lines and bits hampering further progress we are actively trying to make right now?