From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 02:44:31 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re* Consequences of CRLF in index? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Stefan Beller writes: > (I note this as you regard your patches as a lunch time hack > in the cooking email; I am serious about these patches though.) We do not want to touch borrowed code unnecessarily. Are these lines and bits hampering further progress we are actively trying to make right now?