Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] object-info: add option for retrieving object info
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 30, 2022, 23:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpmm357p2.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <20220330224314.2310534-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Calvin and I discussed details of implementation before he wrote these > patches, and my thinking at that time was that to get the relevant > information, we're prepared to fetch the objects themselves from the > remote if need be, but prefer to fetch only metadata if possible, so > putting it in "fetch" seemed reasonable to me. But I agree that it's > probably better to put it somewhere else.
Yeah, I am sympathetic that every "learning something from remote" looks like a "fetch". After all, a remote blame may be "fetching the result of running blame". But it may not be a good way to decide what the feature should be called.
Thanks.