Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] rev-list: print additional missing object information
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 5, 2025, 18:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpljwnt26.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <4peozlz56kmdhziyq6uhsvm4t7atmwtbl7divyuqqb4l64wgom@z3adjdx7v5x2>
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com> writes:
> wouldn't be sufficient to determine where each record would end. Using > two NUL bytes next to each other to mark the end of a record would work > though.
I think we already use that convention elsewhere, and that is why I brought it up as a potential approach to take.