From: Junio C Hamano Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 18:29:53 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] rev-list: print additional missing object information Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4peozlz56kmdhziyq6uhsvm4t7atmwtbl7divyuqqb4l64wgom@z3adjdx7v5x2> Justin Tobler writes: > wouldn't be sufficient to determine where each record would end. Using > two NUL bytes next to each other to mark the end of a record would work > though. I think we already use that convention elsewhere, and that is why I brought it up as a potential approach to take.