Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] t/t3308-notes-merge.sh: succeed with relaxed notes refs
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 6, 2015, 23:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqoaqbmpmj.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <A5A16FEC-D72C-4B21-8BE1-3A41696DFF49@gmail.com>
"Kyle J. McKay" <mackyle@gmail.com> writes:
> A whitelist solves issue (1) but is no help for issue (2) unless some > additional additional part of the refs namespace were to be also > whitelisted. Perhaps something like refs/x-<anything>/... in the same > vein as the various IETF standards for experimental names.
Your (2) is about people who are _experimenting_, no?
Why can't they use refs/notes/x-<anything>/* while doing so, and when that matures and proves useful to wider public we can make it more official by whitelisting refs/<that-thing> in addition to refs/notes/, and the problem is solved, no?