Re: [PATCH v7] describe: refresh the index when 'broken' flag is used
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 1, 2024, 19:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqle2lvsmz.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOLa=ZS359bMtUd+ktvJgHsiG-0=VVdGWYA2mKCNjc_1BrzcvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
> This explains for why 'broken' must use a subprocess, but there is > nothing stopping 'dirty' from also using a subprocess, right? It > currently uses an in-process index refresh but it _could_ be a > subprocess too.
Correct, except that it does not make sense to do any and all things that you _could_ do. So...