Re: [PATCH 3/3] clone: propagate empty remote HEAD even with other branches

> If so, do you prefer to go straight there in patch 3 (and drop patch 2,
> keeping the unborn setup inline), or do you prefer to see it on top?
> Normally I'd suggest the former, but I worry that doing it all in one
> patch means it's reorganizing the code _and_ changing the behavior all
> at once, which is harder to reason about. And I don't see an easy way to
> reorganize the code without changing the behavior.