From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 18:50:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clone: propagate empty remote HEAD even with other branches
Message-ID: <xmqqk08ozrid.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <Yscaoz8qmPYiiLO5@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> If so, do you prefer to go straight there in patch 3 (and drop patch 2,
> keeping the unborn setup inline), or do you prefer to see it on top?
> Normally I'd suggest the former, but I worry that doing it all in one
> patch means it's reorganizing the code _and_ changing the behavior all
> at once, which is harder to reason about. And I don't see an easy way to
> reorganize the code without changing the behavior.

Either way is fine, but the "go straight there" approach may work
better, I suspect.

Thanks.