Re: [PATCH 3/3] rename_ref: replace empty deletion message in HEAD's log
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 17, 2017, 22:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqino8qx5t.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170217195549.z6uyy7hbbhj5avh7@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Thinking on it more, we probably _do_ want two entries. Because the > operations are not atomic, it's possible that we may end up in a > half-way state after the first entry is written. And when debugging such > a case, I'd much rather see the first half of the operation logged than > nothing at all.
Yes, that sounds right.