Re: [PATCH 2/3] update-ref: pass reflog message argument to delete_refs
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Feb 17, 2017, 08:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170217082253.kxjezkxfqkfxjhzr@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170217035800.13214-3-kyle@kyleam.com>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:57:59PM -0500, Kyle Meyer wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Now that delete_refs() accepts a reflog message, pass the > user-provided message to delete_refs() rather than silently dropping > it. The doesn't matter for the deleted ref's log because the log is > deleted along with the ref, but this entry will show up in HEAD's > reflog when deleting a checked out branch.
Sounds good.
Show 10 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/update-ref.c b/builtin/update-ref.c > index a41f9adf1..f642acc22 100644 > --- a/builtin/update-ref.c > +++ b/builtin/update-ref.c > @@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ int cmd_update_ref(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > */ > return delete_ref(refname, > (oldval && !is_null_sha1(oldsha1)) ? oldsha1 : NULL, > - flags, NULL); > + flags, msg);
This looks obviously correct.
Show 16 quoted lines
> diff --git a/t/t1400-update-ref.sh b/t/t1400-update-ref.sh > index b0ffc0b57..65918d984 100755 > --- a/t/t1400-update-ref.sh > +++ b/t/t1400-update-ref.sh > @@ -85,6 +85,15 @@ test_expect_success "delete $m (by HEAD)" ' > ' > rm -f .git/$m > > +test_expect_success "deleting current branch adds message to HEAD's log" ' > + git update-ref $m $A && > + git symbolic-ref HEAD $m && > + git update-ref -mdelmsg -d $m && > + ! test -f .git/$m && > + grep "delmsg$" .git/logs/HEAD >/dev/null > +' > +rm -f .git/$m
I think covering this with a test is good.
I don't know if it's also worth testing that deleting via HEAD also writes the reflog. I.e.,:
git update-ref -m delete-by-head -d HEAD
Some of the style here is a bit out-dated, but I think you are just matching the surrounding tests. So that's OK by me (though a patch to modernize the whole thing would be welcome, too).
For reference, the two things I notice are:
- we prefer test_path_is_missing to "! test -f" these days.
- we don't redirect the output of grep (it's handled already in
non-verbose mode, and in verbose mode we try to be...verbose).-Peff