From: Junio C Hamano Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 22:18:06 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rename_ref: replace empty deletion message in HEAD's log Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20170217195549.z6uyy7hbbhj5avh7@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King writes: > Thinking on it more, we probably _do_ want two entries. Because the > operations are not atomic, it's possible that we may end up in a > half-way state after the first entry is written. And when debugging such > a case, I'd much rather see the first half of the operation logged than > nothing at all. Yes, that sounds right.