Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] midx: add MIDX_PROGRESS flag <snip>
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 16, 2019, 02:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqh849a1b4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <04342d12-fffc-afb6-fa4e-c2e2bf88d1b6@gmail.com>
William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com> writes:
> At this time there are no other MIDX_* flags and so there's always the option > to revisit the best way to handle multiple MIDX_* flags if/when additional > flags are added.
I do not care too deeply either way, but if you wrote it in one way, how about completing the series without changing it in the middle, and leave the clean-ups to a follow-up series (if needed)?