From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 02:09:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] midx: add MIDX_PROGRESS flag <snip>
Message-ID: <xmqqh849a1b4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <04342d12-fffc-afb6-fa4e-c2e2bf88d1b6@gmail.com>

William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com> writes:

> At this time there are no other MIDX_* flags and so there's always the option
> to revisit the best way to handle multiple MIDX_* flags if/when additional
> flags are added.

I do not care too deeply either way, but if you wrote it in one way,
how about completing the series without changing it in the middle,
and leave the clean-ups to a follow-up series (if needed)?