Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] midx: add MIDX_PROGRESS flag <snip>
- From
- William Baker <williamtbakeremail@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 16, 2019, 19:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <35cd8f8c-de66-819e-0a9f-c0905255721d@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqh849a1b4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
On 10/15/19 7:09 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> At this time there are no other MIDX_* flags and so there's always the option >> to revisit the best way to handle multiple MIDX_* flags if/when additional >> flags are added. > > I do not care too deeply either way, but if you wrote it in one way, > how about completing the series without changing it in the middle, > and leave the clean-ups to a follow-up series (if needed)?
That plan sounds good to me. The most recent series (v3) should be ready to go, I don't believe there is any outstanding feedback to address.
Thanks, William