Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Switch links to https
Josh Soref <jsoref@gmail.com> writes:
Show 14 quoted lines
> Elijah Newren wrote:
>> As stated elsewhere, I'd be fine with using the archived link if the
>> justification presented in the series for using archived links was
>> consistent and mentioned both reasons for changes. But, I think this
>> series is fine to merge down as-is if you don't want to go through the
>> trouble. Especially given how long you've waited.
>
> I'm clearly still contributing, so I can come back later and cross
> that bridge...
>
>> Anyway, I checked through every link in this series; it all looks good to me.
>
> Let's take this as-is. Thanks for taking the time to re-check every
> link, I know exactly how tedious that is :).
Thanks, both. Will queue.
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>