Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Switch links to https
- From
Josh Soref <jsoref@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 24, 2023, 16:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CACZqfqAq0ijtYO9-1q6h2KQMyxHgLpFOg--d4c9F4xT0nMkvUg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CABPp-BGhHivx9_R6fwL--K5nTvz1sh67JDMtWG7WajxmX=56Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Elijah Newren wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> As stated elsewhere, I'd be fine with using the archived link if the > justification presented in the series for using archived links was > consistent and mentioned both reasons for changes. But, I think this > series is fine to merge down as-is if you don't want to go through the > trouble. Especially given how long you've waited.
I'm clearly still contributing, so I can come back later and cross that bridge...
> Anyway, I checked through every link in this series; it all looks good to me.
Let's take this as-is. Thanks for taking the time to re-check every link, I know exactly how tedious that is :).