Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] repack: accept larger window-memory and max-pack-size
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 23, 2014, 18:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqd2jiv92q.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140123012656.GC17254@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 28 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:06:42PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > >> But I think there is a subtle problem. Here (and elsewhere) we use the >> parsed value of "0" as a sentinel. I think that is OK for >> --max-pack-size, where "0" is not a reasonable value. But git-repack(1) >> says: >> >> --window-memory=0 makes memory usage unlimited, which is the default. >> >> What does: >> >> git config pack.windowMemory 256m >> git repack --window-memory=0 >> >> do? It should override the config, but I think it does not with your >> patch (nor with the current code). Using a string would fix that (though >> you could also fix it by using a different sentinel, like ULONG_MAX). > > Here is a series that does that (and fixes the other issue I found). It > would probably be nice to test these things, but checking that they > actually had an impact is tricky (how do you know that --window-memory > did the right thing?). > > [1/3]: repack: fix typo in max-pack-size option > [2/3]: repack: make parsed string options const-correct > [3/3]: repack: propagate pack-objects options as strings > > -Peff
Sounds sensible; will chuck the hum-ulong series and replace with these patches.
Thanks.