Re: [PATCH 0/1] replay: add --revert option to reverse commit changes
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 26, 2025, 21:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqcy54mro6.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <27fef9e1-bf26-48af-b3df-35948937c891@gmail.com>
Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> 1. For quick undoing an entire MR, the `merge-tree` approach you > suggest is indeed more efficient and avoids unnecessary intermediate > conflicts. > > 2. For commit-by-commit reverts, we need individual revert commits with > proper attribution (which commit is being reverted) for auditability and > history clarity. This is particularly useful when only specific commits > from a merged branch need to be reverted.
These are both good workflows with appropriate uses. To make the tool useful for #2, it needs to be able to allow "I have merged a topic with 7 commits, but the first commit and the fourth commit are faulty and I need to revert them", i.e., not just a range (like "rebase" and "cherry-pick" workflows take), but a set of commits that are potentially disconnected. The current command line arguments "git replay" supports, or "git revert A..B" for that matter, are not exactly a good fit for such a use case, although the user can of course run two single-commit revert operations in a row.