Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] replay: add --revert mode to reverse commit changes
- From
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
- Date
- Dec 5, 2025, 11:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <aTLDEgGzVnvU45va@pks.im>
- In-Reply-To
- <20251202201611.22137-3-siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 03, 2025 at 01:46:11AM +0530, Siddharth Asthana wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/replay.c b/builtin/replay.c
> index 6606a2c94b..7660f7412f 100644
> --- a/builtin/replay.c
> +++ b/builtin/replay.c
> @@ -77,9 +105,14 @@ static struct commit *create_commit(struct repository *repo,
>
> commit_list_insert(parent, &parents);
> extra = read_commit_extra_headers(based_on, exclude_gpgsig);
> - find_commit_subject(message, &orig_message);
> - strbuf_addstr(&msg, orig_message);
> - author = get_author(message);
> + if (action == REPLAY_REVERT) {
> + generate_revert_message(&msg, based_on, repo);
> + author = xstrdup(git_author_info(IDENT_STRICT));
> + } else {
> + find_commit_subject(message, &orig_message);
> + strbuf_addstr(&msg, orig_message);
> + author = get_author(message);
> + }
> reset_ident_date();
> if (commit_tree_extended(msg.buf, msg.len, &tree->object.oid, parents,
> &ret, author, NULL, sign_commit, extra)) {Do we want to be defensive in those if-chains and verify that `action == REPLAY_PICK` in the other case, and `BUG()` if it's not?
Show 43 quoted lines
> @@ -273,21 +322,39 @@ static struct commit *pick_regular_commit(struct repository *repo,
> pickme_tree = repo_get_commit_tree(repo, pickme);
> base_tree = repo_get_commit_tree(repo, base);
>
> - merge_opt->branch1 = short_commit_name(repo, replayed_base);
> - merge_opt->branch2 = short_commit_name(repo, pickme);
> - merge_opt->ancestor = xstrfmt("parent of %s", merge_opt->branch2);
> + if (action == REPLAY_PICK) {
> + /* Cherry-pick: normal order */
> + merge_opt->branch1 = short_commit_name(repo, replayed_base);
> + merge_opt->branch2 = short_commit_name(repo, pickme);
> + merge_opt->ancestor = xstrfmt("parent of %s", merge_opt->branch2);
>
> - merge_incore_nonrecursive(merge_opt,
> - base_tree,
> - result->tree,
> - pickme_tree,
> - result);
> + merge_incore_nonrecursive(merge_opt,
> + base_tree,
> + result->tree,
> + pickme_tree,
> + result);
>
> - free((char*)merge_opt->ancestor);
> + free((char *)merge_opt->ancestor);
> + } else {
> + /* Revert: swap base and pickme to reverse the diff */
> + const char *pickme_name = short_commit_name(repo, pickme);
> + merge_opt->branch1 = short_commit_name(repo, replayed_base);
> + merge_opt->branch2 = xstrfmt("parent of %s", pickme_name);
> + merge_opt->ancestor = pickme_name;
> +
> + merge_incore_nonrecursive(merge_opt,
> + pickme_tree,
> + result->tree,
> + base_tree,
> + result);
> +
> + free((char *)merge_opt->branch2);
> + }
> merge_opt->ancestor = NULL;
> + merge_opt->branch2 = NULL;We can `FREE_AND_NULL()` instead of manually unsetting these.
Show 21 quoted lines
> @@ -387,18 +460,28 @@ int cmd_replay(int argc,
> argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, replay_options, replay_usage,
> PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 | PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT);
>
> - if (!onto_name && !advance_name_opt) {
> - error(_("option --onto or --advance is mandatory"));
> + /* Exactly one mode must be specified */
> + if (!onto_name && !advance_name_opt && !revert_name_opt) {
> + error(_("exactly one of --onto, --advance, or --revert is required"));
> usage_with_options(replay_usage, replay_options);
> }
>
> die_for_incompatible_opt2(!!advance_name_opt, "--advance",
> - contained, "--contained");
> + !!onto_name, "--onto");
> + die_for_incompatible_opt2(!!revert_name_opt, "--revert",
> + !!onto_name, "--onto");
> + die_for_incompatible_opt2(!!revert_name_opt, "--revert",
> + !!advance_name_opt, "--advance");
> + die_for_incompatible_opt2(contained, "--contained",
> + !onto_name, "requires --onto");We have `die_for_incompatible_opt3()` that can be used here to check for mutual exclusivity of "--revert", "--advance" and "--onto".
Show 33 quoted lines
> @@ -508,7 +594,7 @@ int cmd_replay(int argc,
> kh_value(replayed_commits, pos) = last_commit;
>
> /* Update any necessary branches */
> - if (advance_name)
> + if (advance_name || revert_name)
> continue;
> decoration = get_name_decoration(&commit->object);
> if (!decoration)
> @@ -532,7 +618,7 @@ int cmd_replay(int argc,
> }
> }
>
> - /* In --advance mode, advance the target ref */
> + /* In --advance or --revert mode, update the target ref */
> if (result.clean == 1 && advance_name) {
> if (handle_ref_update(ref_mode, transaction, advance_name,
> &last_commit->object.oid,
> @@ -544,6 +630,17 @@ int cmd_replay(int argc,
> goto cleanup;
> }
> }
> + if (result.clean == 1 && revert_name) {
> + if (handle_ref_update(ref_mode, transaction, revert_name,
> + &last_commit->object.oid,
> + &onto->object.oid,
> + reflog_msg.buf,
> + &transaction_err) < 0) {
> + ret = error(_("failed to update ref '%s': %s"),
> + revert_name, transaction_err.buf);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + }This conditional and the one beforehand are the exact same, except that we use either `revert_name` or `advance_name`. Let's merge them:
if (result.clean == 1 && (revert_name || advance_name)) {
const char *ref = revert_name ? revert_name : advance_name;
if (handle_ref_update(ref_mode, transaction, ref,
&last_commit->object.oid,
&onto->object.oid,
reflog_msg.buf,
&transaction_err) < 0) {
ret = error(_("failed to update ref '%s': %s"),
revert_name, transaction_err.buf);
goto cleanup;
}
}Patrick