Re: [PATCH] pager: exit without error on SIGPIPE
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2021, 20:55 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq8s87ld8y.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87wnvrefbv.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
Show 28 quoted lines
>> Would it be the matter of propagating the exit status of the pager
>> noticed by wait_or_white() down thru finish_command_in_signal() and
>> wait_for_pager(1) to here, so
>>
>> - If we know pager exited with non-zero status, we would report,
>> perhaps with warning(_("..."));
>>
>> - If we notice we got a SIGPIPE, we ignore it---it is nothing of
>> interest to the end-user;
>>
>> - Otherwise we do not do anything differently.
>>
>> would be sufficient? Implementors of "git -p" may know that "git"
>> happens to implement its paging by piping its output to an external
>> pager, but the end-users do not care. Implementors may say they are
>> giving 'q' to their pager "less", but to the end-users, who report
>> "I ran 'git log' and after reading a pageful, I told it to 'q'uit",
>> the distinction does not have any importance.
>>
>> Or are there more to it, in that the exit status we get from the
>> pager, combined with the kind of signal we are getting, is not
>> sufficient for us to tell what is going on?
>
> It is, I just wonder if ignoring the exit code is a practical issue as
> long as we're not clobbering SIGPIPE, particularly with my trace2
> logging patch in this thread.
>
> But yeah, we could patch git to handle this in the general case....Sorry, but now you lost me.
I was merely wondering if Denton's patch can become a small update on top of these, if we just made sure that the exit code of the pager noticed by wait_or_whine() is reported to the code where Denton makes the decision to say "let's not re-raise but simply exit with 0 return as what we got is SIGPIPE". I guess we could even make git exit with the pager's return code in that case, as the end-user observable result would be similar to "git log | less" where 'less' may be segfaulting or exiting cleanly.
IOW, something like this on top of your three-patch series?
pager.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git c/pager.c w/pager.c index 3d37dd7ada..73bc5fc0e4 100644 --- c/pager.c +++ w/pager.c @@ -28,8 +28,14 @@ static void wait_for_pager_atexit(void) static void wait_for_pager_signal(int signo) { + int status; + close_pager_fds(); - finish_command_in_signal(&pager_process); + status = finish_command_in_signal(&pager_process); + + if (signo == SIGPIPE) + exit(status); + sigchain_pop(signo); raise(signo); }