Re: Promoting Git developers
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 17, 2015, 20:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq7fufnzvq.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAP8UFD0NPLF1o8h8hqBfiG76qF1HU9DOCfHqi5-z9DkrV+aEvw@mail.gmail.com>
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:20 AM, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> "Git Annotate"? >> >> "Git Praise" as opposed to blame? >> "Git Who" as a pun on the subcommand structure which doesn't always >> follows grammar? > > Yeah these suggestions above are nice, thanks for them, but "Git Rev News" > also look a bit like "git rev-list" and "git rev-parse" which are plumbing Git > commands, so it gives a somewhat "hardcore" look to the news letter which > I like.
Call that "Git Rev List" then to be more direct?
I myself liked the "Review" (spelled in full word) as its non-nerdy sound, as a suitable name for a publication that bridges between hard-core developers and slightly-more-serious-than-casual observers, but its not my call (and as I often say, I am not good at naming things) ;-).