Re: Promoting Git developers
- From
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 16, 2015, 09:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAP8UFD08xoJ2H8XgfDbPfHddX9YFpFgbrY+PZ5Tphuot7JwGvw@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <003001d05f71$81845160$848cf420$@nexbridge.com>
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
>> On March 15, 2015 6:19 PM Christian Couder wrote: > <snip> >> Just one suggestion on the name and half a comment. >> >> How would "Git Review" (or "Git Monthly Review", or replace your favourite >> "how-often-per-period-ly" in its name) sound? I meant it to sound similar > to >> academic journals that summarize and review contemporary works in the > field >> and keeps your original "pun" about our culture around "patch reviews".
I would be ok for that but there is already this Gerrit related command:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/git-review
Maybe I can just use "Git Rev", but it doesn't tell that it is about news?
> If I may humbly offer the suggestion that "Git Blame" would be a far more > appropriate pun as a name :)
You don't want me to steal Junio's blog title:
http://git-blame.blogspot.fr/
don't you?