Re: Promoting Git developers
- From
- David Lang <david@lang.hm>
- Date
- Mar 16, 2015, 23:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.2.02.1503161637210.31344@nftneq.ynat.uz>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqvbi1sy4h.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Sun, 15 Mar 2015, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes: > >> I wrote something about a potential Git Rev News news letter: > > I read it. Sounds promising. > > Just one suggestion on the name and half a comment. > > How would "Git Review" (or "Git Monthly Review", or replace your > favourite "how-often-per-period-ly" in its name) sound? I meant it > to sound similar to academic journals that summarize and review > contemporary works in the field and keeps your original "pun" about > our culture around "patch reviews". > > I obviously do not know how the actual contents would look like at > this point, but depending on the quality of the publication I might > be able to steal some descriptions when keeping the notes on topics > in flight that appear in my "What's cooking" report. And it can go > the other way around, too. The publication may want to peek my > "What's cooking" report for hints on how to characterize each topic > and assess its impact to the evolution of Git.
I'll bet that LWN would publish, or at least link to, such articles on a regular basis, and if you end up doing an in-depth writeup on a particularly discussed topic, they would probably give it pretty good visibility.
David Lang